Two imams pulled from plane because passengers felt uncomfortable

http://www.cnn.com/2011/TRAVEL/05/07/muslims.kicked.off.plane/index.html?hpt=T2

land of the free

AMERICA! FUCK YA!

Its wrong on so many levels to do that. Force someone off a plane because they make you "uncomfortable" or "uneasy". Everyone immediately thinks "OH MY GOD A TOWEL HEAD, HES GUNNA BLOW UP OUR PLANE AHHHHHH D: " I mean come on. Be for real for once people. Not every person out there is bad just because they are Muslim. It truly irritates me how people act and think sometimes.

Tophat 44 wrote:AMERICA! FUCK YA!

There is no need for your sarcasm. This sounds text book to me. For example if I was driving my truck and they were trying to hitch hike I totally wouldn't stop.

I don't know if you guys are being sarcastic with the "America fuck yeas" but it's getting a bit annoying seeing as how you guys post it in just about everythread now. Americans don't need to yell "Fuck yea" to show that they love America. It is immplied that you love America by being REAL American.

Also, i was editing my post shef. so ya.


666 POST

I think this is pretty serious. I mean remember this?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gl4qtMaZu1M

But on a serious note. Don't fat people make plane rides uncomfortable too? I think so. I believe we need to treat the fats like we treat muslims.

I would bet money this is only getting coverage because Bin Laden was killed a week ago.

Some Americans really piss me off, soo fucking ignorant.

Masta Shef wrote:There is no need for your sarcasm. This sounds text book to me. For example if I was driving my truck and they were trying to hitch hike I totally wouldn't stop.

Text book? It's text book to kick people off of a plane based on their ethnicity?

I understand that some feel uneasy, but seriously, if the guys had no weapons or bombs on them, then why the fuck can't they fly on a plane?

Made in Finland wrote:

Masta Shef wrote:There is no need for your sarcasm. This sounds text book to me. For example if I was driving my truck and they were trying to hitch hike I totally wouldn't stop.

Text book? It's text book to kick people off of a plane based on their ethnicity?

I understand that some feel uneasy, but seriously, if the guys had no weapons or bombs on them, then why the fuck can't they fly on a plane?

Wow I guess Mad in Finland just lost his sense of sarcasm.

Masta Shef wrote:Wow I guess Mad in Finland just lost his sense of sarcasm.

Sarcasm doesn't really get through that well when in other threads you're saying things like that in complete seriousness.

Throwing 2 passengers off a plane based on that is just ridiculus. I mean, I understand we are on a "elevated" threat level right now (since the terrorists in the ME are threatening a revenge attack), but how paranoid are we going to get? They were screened just like everyone else. If they weren't satisfied, screen them again just for precaution, but don't throw them off an entire plane...

If the passengers were too paranoid, make them find a new plane, if anything.

They should have shot both of them.





















(With love guns.)

Yeah everyone is freaking out that there is going to be an attack in retaliation for Osama's death. Should they have removed them from the plane? No.

Muslims aren't the only terrorists.

andr_00_ew wrote:Muslims are the only terrorists.

Fix'd.

andr_00_ew wrote:Muslims aren't the only terrorists.

Are you implying there that all Muslim's are terrorists, or did you just phrase that last part wrong?



EDIT: @jag - I hope you're joking...

I think he means there are other things we should be suspicious of when suspecting terrorists other than turbans and goofy glasses and names that end in 'Mohammed'.

Of course I am. I forget how hard sarcasm is to detect on the internet.

How is that phrased wrong? He clearly said muslims are not the only terrorists. In other words, not all terrorists are muslims.

eaustinn36 wrote:

andr_00_ew wrote:Muslims aren't the only terrorists.

Are you implying there that all Muslim's are terrorists, or did you just phrase that last part wrong?



EDIT: @jag - I hope you're joking...

No. He is stating that anyone can be a terrorist.... -_-
Learn your history.

Learn your history.

I don't get the point of this comment as it was obviously a simple reading error that has already been pointed out twice.

in fact, even if the reading error hadn't been pointed out, this comment would make no sense.

dfghjkl;'

Jeez... didn't know this would happen...

To me at least, the statement "Muslims aren't the only terrorists." sounded like "All Muslim's are terrorist, but they aren't the only ones", but maybe it is just the way I read it.

Fine.
Erik if you were to remember from history and read his sentence. andrew said that not all terrorist are Muslim. There has been other terrorist cells such as the IRA and there has been one in Spain for a long time.
So if people were to just remember history, we would never have the phrase "all Muslims are terrorist."

Also please stop trying to get a deeper meaning and accept a simple one.

P.S. never saw those last 2 post due to moving around back and forth in my house.

Wow... I think there is a major misunderstanding here.

I'm NOT saying that all terrorists are Muslim. I am obviously aware that non-Muslim terrorists exist.

I AM saying the the statement "All Muslim's are terrorists" is inaccurate.

Can you guys NOT get into an argument over something? That should be an achievement on the site.