All Future Call of Duty's to Have Pay to Play

BLACK SNOW 13 wrote:

Fattyboy122 wrote:I could not understand the sentence you probably forgot the n in then on purpose. But whatever you say animal fucker,not that anyone takes you seriously or cares about what you say.

Using obviously wrong stereotypes in an arguments is pathetic.

Eventually it will go from human/animal like creatures to straight up animals,if it has not already. So I am just saving the time and calling you what you are, a no good animal fucking whiney baby who wants attention. I no longer care if I am banned from the site because I am sick of seeing you act like a retard on it everyday, a retard who has nothing good to contribute to this site.

Fattyboy122 wrote:I no longer care if I am banned from the site because I am sick of seeing you act like a retard on it everyday, a retard who has nothing good to contribute to this site.

I agree fully at this point. I have said it before and i will say it again. Ban fucking animal fucker. He's only here to troll the site.

Question: How does talking about video games leads to this? I never did nothing wrong but voiced my opinion but I'll be damned if someone goes and uses my personal intrest as a reason to argue their opinion. Especially if its wrong in every way possible.

Oh cool, can I get a beastiality link?

yo man just be the bigger man and leave it alone. dont feed the trolls. the last thing we need is another troll thread. just ignore it.

BLACK SNOW 13 wrote:I never did nothing wrong but voiced my opinion...

See that's why everyone hates you. All you ever do is "voice your opinion", nothing else. You never ever provide a valid argument to back up your opinions, and if someone disagrees with you, you call the faggots and expect everyone to accept your "opinions" as universal facts.

i dont really want to pick sides but i think Fin won that round

the only way they could make money (and not for us paying ) is that they make more DLc that would be better we get more Maps And Zombies While they get the money everything sorted but thats my opinion.

once again black snow, just ignorif you dont like it you dont have to them, you dont have to stop posting, just need to stop replying to the people you are having trouble with. the more you reply to them the more of a kick they are getting out of you.

Honestly, it's at the point where a little maturity needs to be shown. I am talking to Black Snow and the members that responded to his trolling with "animal fucker" and the like.

Black Snow, if you dislike BLOPS, that's completely valid. Some people just don't like the game, that's cool. Whatever man. And if you like MoH, more power to you. Again, not my cup of tea, but I know some people really enjoy it. You don't back up any of your arguments, though, which is trolling in itself. In addition, saying that the game is better than MvC3 is ridiculous in every way. MvC3 has not come out yet and there is absolutely no basis for you argument; you only said that to rile people up because you know the majority of the active members are excited for MvC3. Don't shit up active threads with your pathetic trolling, please. You basically ask for members to respond adversely to your post and it's at the point where I think you actually enjoy it.

As to those of you who responded with flames and insults: please just be mature. I dislike trolling and opinions without valid arguments as much as any of you, but you simply just make the problem even worse by responding like that. Flames and insults of that like are completely unacceptable under any circumstance. Grow up, guys.

I specifically apologize, not to blacksnow but to the rest of the site for the words I used. I just got sick of him thats all and I voiced my feelings about him and the way he acts.

Fattyboy122 wrote:I specifically apologize, not to blacksnow but to the rest of the site for the words I used. I just got sick of him thats all and I voiced my feelings about him and the way he acts.

No no no, you voiced your OPINION about him.

That's the magic word. Just use it, and everyone is powerless. Because everyone is allowed to have their own opinion about anything, and the opinion can be anything you want too! And that's why if you call something you've said an "opinion" it becomes an universal fact.

Opinion isnt always ok depending on how you use it.

just because someone dislikes gay people (not saying i do), does not mean that they can voice there opinion using derogatory terms like fag, homo, fudgepacker, ect ect.

just the same, you cant just go around calling people " Animal Fucker" because you dont like furries.

Kush Befor Dusk wrote:Opinion isnt always ok depending on how you use it.

just because someone dislikes gay people (not saying i do), does not mean that they can voice there opinion using derogatory terms like fag, homo, fudgepacker, ect ect.

just the same, you cant just go around calling people " Animal Fucker" because you dont like furries.

It's called sarcasm. Look it up.

i realise it was sarcasm. i was stating a point. anyway im not getting into this anymore

Finally people are learning.

But if you seriously want me to give some back up to why I chose what I say then here it is.

Black Ops: At first is was cool with the customization and all that but know... I see it as the same thing as MW2 but worse. The weapons are either overpowered or under powered. Then some perks are completely useless. That and the graphic are not as good as MW2.

MvC3: Yeah it hasn't came out yet but I can already assume its gonna be the same shit as before. MvC is just one of those games which seems to have no repeatability value hence its going to be the same thing over and over. I've played the MvC2 with friends and online but just did not like it at all.

MoH: I might not play it as much due to some anger issues lately but still I've enjoy it every time. I see new strategies practically every other game. Then there the weapon system that been kept some what simple and the weapons do have a noticeable uniqueness between guns such as the AK47 is better at close-mid range and powerful while the M16 is better at mid-long range with higher accuracy. Then there is the constant large engagements that some how stay in the same location for 5 minutes at the time where its everyone is basically shooting back and fourth or playing cat and mouse. I can go on about this for a while.

This help you understand my opinions?

God this worse the /v/ when you guys call out trolls.

No replay value? You must have been playing a different game than me.

Same game, felt like there was nothing new to do.

It's a fighting game with a roster of 50+ characters that all have unique movesets.

I'm not sure what else you could ask for.

Yeah there that but its just... I really can't explain in well enough its just feels like the same thing over and over. I don't know but I felt like there was no need to own a game that been the same every time but with more characters.

BLACK SNOW 13 wrote:Yeah there that but its just... I really can't explain in well enough its just feels like the same thing over and over. I don't know but I felt like there was no need to own a game that been the same every time but with more characters.

Reasons why Marvel Vs. Capcom 3 is $60.00 while MvC2 is $15.00

1. More in depth story. Individual character endings
2. Updated graphics and gameplay to limit "god characters"
3. Bigger multi-player rooms. (Not sure what else they are doing with the multi-player though)
4. Mission Mode
5. Tons of new and old characters

I can see why MvC2 doesn't have much re-playability. It was made a decade ago, and has the re-playability of any arcade game. We just enjoy it and make it our own, which adds more re-playability much like it has in GTA with zombies.

I might have a friend who might get it. I'll try it out then see if I can make peace with the issue. >_>

How can a fighting game be the same thing over and over. in the 1000 plus matches I've played i can say none of them have been the same. That's not an opinion, that's a fact.

BLACK SNOW 13 wrote:Finally people are learning.

But if you seriously want me to give some back up to why I chose what I say then here it is.

Black Ops: At first is was cool with the customization and all that but know... I see it as the same thing as MW2 but worse. The weapons are either overpowered or under powered. Then some perks are completely useless. That and the graphic are not as good as MW2.

MvC3: Yeah it hasn't came out yet but I can already assume its gonna be the same shit as before. MvC is just one of those games which seems to have no repeatability value hence its going to be the same thing over and over. I've played the MvC2 with friends and online but just did not like it at all.

MoH: I might not play it as much due to some anger issues lately but still I've enjoy it every time. I see new strategies practically every other game. Then there the weapon system that been kept some what simple and the weapons do have a noticeable uniqueness between guns such as the AK47 is better at close-mid range and powerful while the M16 is better at mid-long range with higher accuracy. Then there is the constant large engagements that some how stay in the same location for 5 minutes at the time where its everyone is basically shooting back and fourth or playing cat and mouse. I can go on about this for a while.

This help you understand my opinions?

God this worse the /v/ when you guys call out trolls.

I'm pretty sure everyone has said what they needed to say about the OP, so I'm going to comment on what Black Snow spewed out.

Your argument about why BlackOps is bad still has not been backed up. You made some generalizations that can be said about every damn fps on the market. Why don't you point out specifics so I can take you seriously?

You don't like MvC because you don't like fighters. Just say THAT. When you go and say that you don't like it because it is a bad game you sound like you have no idea what you're talking about. This paired with the fact that you don't own the game and only played it about once makes your argument invalid. No re-playability? The group of us that have the game bought it the night it was released on XBLA almost 2 years ago on a WHIM. We have consistently played the game pretty much every single night since. It has never even once gotten boring and is different every single time. There are 50 characters. I have only learned about 8 of them. The better we get, the more fun it gets. If you want to talk about video games on a video game website, with people who play video games you need to be able to express your ideas better. You could have simply said that you do not like the game.

As far as your OPINION (I place this in capitals because your so fond of throwing that word in our faces,) on MoH....

I have never played the game so if you want to consider what I have to say invalid than go ahead. Even though I have never played the game I can make an INTELLIGENT prediction that the game is AVERAGE at best. It has a metacritic score of 72 based on 71 reviews, and a 6.7 user score based on 171 ratings (http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/medal-of-honor.) The game is built by 2 teams, the multiplayer being handled by DICE who previously released BFBC2, a modern day multiplayer heavy fps. Not only did they make the multiplayer nearly identical, but its also worse, this is the general consensus of multiple reviews I have read. On the single player side the game is a modern-day military themed FPS. EA joined the modern warfare party late here because everything has been done before, whether it was by the COD series, the Rainbow Six series, the ARMA series, or the Operation Flashpoint series, and it has been done better. Everything you described about MoH that you like is run of the mill.

"noticeable uniqueness between guns such as the AK47 is better at close-mid range and powerful while the M16 is better at mid-long range with higher accuracy"

Any game that has an Ak47 and an M16 follows this trend. Guns handling differently is a staple of any decent fps around. I know for a fact that this is how these guns handle in the COD series. This is no big deal.

"large engagements that some how stay in the same location for 5 minutes at the time where its everyone is basically shooting back and fourth or playing cat and mouse. I can go on about this for a while."

The Battlefield series is well known for this and does an EXCELLENT job at it, far better than MoH.

o QuickShott o wrote:

Tophat 44 wrote:I agree fully. At this rate anyway though CoD will die after BLOPS.

In my opinion, CoD died when MW2 came out.

agreed