Worst current-gen game you've played?

Turok (X360) takes the cake for me.

Terribad controls, horrible story, jagged edges all over the place, dinosaurs that weren't even fun to kill.

You think, "Dude, I can slay a fucking T-Rex? This game will be the bee's knees!"

But no, fuck you, it's most certainly not.

Well they pretty much all suck.

LSL Box office bust....

that shit went to selling 5 bucks new in a week

Darkest of Days

it was a pretty weird game, you time travel to different eras, (civil war, ww1, civil war AGAIN, ww1 AGAIN, ww2 (you are in a prison camp and you have to escape), then Mt. Vesueveus (or however you spell it)) and you look for certain people, it sounds fun, but the voice acting is horrible, the controls pissed me off multiple times, the story....there barely is one, you start fighting at General Custer's last stand (or whatever it is), then you get hit by an arrow, a guy in a big metallic, space-like suit comes out of a blue plasma like shield and takes you to a base, then you go to the different eras looking for people). i never did beat it, i got to the last level and stopped because: 1. it was too hard, died every five seconds, tried multiple paths, and 2. it got boring after dying to many times.

so, yeah......

Legendary.
Reopen Pandora's box, fight mythical monsters thinking "This is gonna be great!"
However, the graphics are horrible along with the voice acting. You fight an astounding 5 monsters with a jawdropping 7 weapons. Horrible.

mw2

^haha, agreed

Fallout 3.

DeadApe wrote:Fallout 3.

is that the game that was better than Oblivion, idk i think it was.

But, Godfather 2 for me, it wasn't worth a free.

MagicMan313 wrote:

DeadApe wrote:Fallout 3.

is that the game that was better than Oblivion, idk i think it was.

Sorry sir, you are mistaken.

DeadApe wrote:

MagicMan313 wrote:

DeadApe wrote:Fallout 3.

is that the game that was better than Oblivion, idk i think it was.

Sorry sir, you are mistaken.

Dead ape how can you say this is not fun at all.

Oh c'mon, Fallout 3 wasn't that bad. As an old Fallout and Resident Evil fan, I think Fallout 3 did the same thing Resident Evil 4 did. Flipped everything upside down and raped the series' old games... Only difference is, Fallout 3 was still a good game after doing so. Nowhere near as good as 1 & 2, but at least worth playing.

Made in Finland wrote:Oh c'mon, Fallout 3 wasn't that bad. As an old Fallout and Resident Evil fan, I think Fallout 3 did the same thing Resident Evil 4 did. Flipped everything upside down and raped the series' old games... Only difference is, Fallout 3 was still a good game after doing so. Nowhere near as good as 1 & 2, but at least worth playing.

truly, it was good in the sense that they tried something new with the fallout series and it worked for the most part. The downs, it completely copy and pasted the oblivion engine (still though, made by the the same studio) and did have a lack of weapons and items. HOWEVER, too many people bought the game without any prior knowledge of the fallout series and ended up complaining about the amazing storyline when they didn't know jack shit.

Anyway, my worst gen game was probably need for speed undercover (exact copy of most wanted) and MW2

i disagree, i think fallout 3 was far better than the first two, and resident evil 4 was far better than the first three. I mean what did you like most about resident evil 1, 2, or 3. Was it the horrible writing. the god awful camera, or the so easy a 5 year old could solve puzzles. I mean, yea there not zombies anymore in resident evil 4 but so what, i rather have them switch it up a little than run in into the ground, like some games. (cough....Halo.....cough)

you guys could say MW2 in the multiplayer aspect but theres no denying the greatness in the story is there??

ummm could you explain was actually going on in the story to me, because i far as i know its

EXPLOSIONS EXPLOSIONS EXPLOSIONS EXPLOSIONS EXPLOSIONS EXPLOSIONS EXPLOSIONS CLOSE CALL HAND GRAB EXPLOSIONS EXPLOSIONS EXPLOSIONS EXPLOSIONS EXPLOSIONS NUKE EXPLOSIONS EXPLOSIONS EXPLOSIONS CLOSE CALL HAND GRAB, and i think there was some dialog in there.

MagicMan313 wrote:Was it the horrible writing.

Oh yeah, Resident Evil 4 & 5 had a GREAT script, didn't they? Oh wait, no they didn't..

MagicMan313 wrote:the god awful camera

Made you feel helpless when you never knew what was behind the corner, heck sometimes you wouldn't even know what was directly in front of you. Something a good horror game should do.

MagicMan313 wrote:the so easy a 5 year old could solve puzzles

Another thing Resident Evil 4 & 5 were great at, right? Wrong. THEY DIDN'T EVEN FUCKING HAVE PUZZLES! Except the one you did with Ashley, but even that was already 3 moves away from complete.

MagicMan313 wrote:I mean, yea there not zombies anymore in resident evil 4 but so what

"I mean there are no Locust in the next Gears of War, but so what, I'd rather play something differrent this time."
"I mean there is no sneaking in the next Metal Gear, but so what, I'd rather play something differrent this time."

ok first the writing in resident evil 4 isn't great, or even good, but when you compare it to this its god like

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a41TAy7RfVI

the camera didn't make me feel helpless it made me feel frustrated, and if im supposed to be playing this character than i should see what he/she sees, so not seeing something right in front of you isn't a good game mechanic at all, and if you were to follow that logic why not just make the screen completely black so you can't see anything at all, that would be real scary.

and why should the game need puzzles, the were stupid and didn't add any fun so why keep them in. If you want a puzzle go play some fucking sudoku.


and your first example, is actually correct your mainly fighting lambent, not locust in gears 3, and gears of war series has had 2 games with locust, resident evil had 5 i believe.

also stealth is a game mechanic and zombies are an enemy so that doesn't even make sense, but oh wait, the next METAL GEAR game isn't about stealth, Metal Gear Rising seems to be action oriented.

I really liked Fallout 3, personally. It copy and pasted Oblivion's engine, yeah, and had few voice actors, but the story was solid and the gameplay was dynamic and fun. I've not played through the first two, though, so I might not be able to judge the game as well as others. Despite its flaws, I find it hard to call it the worst game of the current-gen.

Resident Evil 4 was great, IMO. I wasn't a big fan of RE5. RE2 and RE4 are tied in my mind as the best of the series. If you're not a fan of the camera angles and the puzzles of RE2, then the game isn't tailored for you.

Anyone play that Bomberman game on the 360? I heard it was god-awful.

Darkest of Days looks like a nice concept done horribly.

Made in Finland wrote:

MagicMan313 wrote:Was it the horrible writing.

Oh yeah, Resident Evil 4 & 5 had a GREAT script, didn't they? Oh wait, no they didn't..

MagicMan313 wrote:the god awful camera

Made you feel helpless when you never knew what was behind the corner, heck sometimes you wouldn't even know what was directly in front of you. Something a good horror game should do.

MagicMan313 wrote:the so easy a 5 year old could solve puzzles

Another thing Resident Evil 4 & 5 were great at, right? Wrong. THEY DIDN'T EVEN FUCKING HAVE PUZZLES! Except the one you did with Ashley, but even that was already 3 moves away from complete.

MagicMan313 wrote:I mean, yea there not zombies anymore in resident evil 4 but so what

"I mean there are no Locust in the next Gears of War, but so what, I'd rather play something differrent this time."
"I mean there is no sneaking in the next Metal Gear, but so what, I'd rather play something differrent this time."

actually there is locust in the new gears but theres more lambent.js

I know nothing about the new GoW other than what I saw at Microsoft's keynote.

Four-player co-op? Enough for me.

AaUndeadMarine wrote:you guys could say MW2 in the multiplayer aspect but theres no denying the greatness in the story is there??

the story wasn't too bad, i just hated the multiplayer, so you are correct.

@SuperMegaKing - you're right, if somebody else could use the same concept as Darkest of Days, but did it good, i would be happy.

Alaskan Adventures... ... ... yeah its a hunting game so what but its still a godawful piece of shitbox just like all of the other cloned hunting games

i dunno i guess that startrek game was pretty shitty too..

ive played a lot of bad games..


and I've come to not like GoW because my xbox always refuses the games, it chews them up, rapes them and then refuses to play them

Halo 3
It not the story or the multiplayer. It's the people who play it that makes me to dislike the game so much. Espicially the ones who want to get the last armor you unlock.

BLACK SNOW 13 wrote:Halo 3
It not the story or the multiplayer. It's the people who play it that makes me to dislike the game so much. Espicially the ones who want to get the last armor you unlock.

seconded